Sex Offenders’ Homes to Be Marked With Pumpkin Symbol
October 16th, 2008 | 
Author: ANNAPOLIS Sex offenders in Maryland have begun receiving paper signs in the mail that read “No candy at this residence,” which they must post on their front doors or possibly face a parole violation. Some bottom-feeding groups are challenging the state law in federal court.
[Editor: Click read more to visit FoxNews.com for more information.]
Enjoy the read? Support DougWeb with coffee money ;) Sphere: Related ContentRelated DougWeb posts:
- Ore. appeals court says no rafting under influence PORTLAND, Ore. — Floating down the river on a raft...
- Federal Judge Prohibits Prayer at Texas Graduation Ceremony – FoxNews.com Should a student violate the order, school district officials could...
- Constitutional Outrage – Ginsburg and Influence of Foreign Law (Thank you Drudge) This is the United States of America,...
- Main Street Cafe – Prince Frederick, MD This great spot was written about in May at SOMD.COM...
- Cliff residents might lose homes to save endangered beetles – washingtonpost.com Cliff residents might lose homes to save endangered beetles –...
- » Bloggers Beware – They’re Coming After You! – Big Government Just when you thought it was safe to start expressing...
- Six Minnesota Members of Congress Homes Vandalized Vandals struck the garages and homes of at least six...
- FOXNews.com – Teacher Who Sought to ‘Demolish’ Tea Party Placed on Leave From School Levin has come under fire for saying he'd do anything...
- Teach the Principles Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com Enjoy the read? Support...
- Dogs and water safety I love when i see a dog on a boat,...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Posted in Uncategorized
By bottom feeder groups do you mean politicians?
John I'm not sure how the bottom-feeder comment applies. This was swiped from Digg so the person who originally dugg the the item at FoxNews may have written that. Good point I should have probably changed that to read something else.
His comment does appear to refer to politicians that object to the sign. That's the way I read it. Perhaps his objection to the politicians stand on the issue could have been made using a different choice of words but it may reflect the anger one might have toward a politician more inclined to respect the sex offender rather than the victim or potential victim.